Talk:MB supported in freebios v2: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 19:08, 6 October 2006

This page looks obsolete and can probably be removed. --Uwe 21:08, 6 October 2006 (CEST)

Is it okay to modify this page to reflect the following hiarchy:

?

Or does this not make sense to do this way?

Thanks,

--jdarby 21:59, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)

then it should be changed to Chipset suppported. that is another matrix. YH

Okay, so how about doing one page for supported motherboards, like this:

And another one for chipsets as described above?

Does that make more sense?

--jdarby 23:06, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)

should be enough, actually the users only care about MB model and reversion. YH

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+This page looks obsolete and can probably be removed. --[[User:Uwe|Uwe]] 21:08, 6 October 2006 (CEST)
+----
 Is it okay to modify this page to reflect the following hiarchy:
-Chipset Vendor
+*Chipset Vendor
- Chipset
+**Chipset
-  Status
+***Status
-  Known Working Motherboards
+***Known Working Motherboards
 ?
@@ Line 13: / Line 17: @@
 --[[User:Jdarby|jdarby]] 21:59, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)
+then it should be changed to Chipset suppported. that is another matrix.
+YH
+Okay, so how about doing one page for supported motherboards, like this:
+*Motherboard Vendor
+**Motherboard
+***Chipset
+***Location in source tree
+***Status
+****Working perpherials
+****Known broken perpherials
+****Diffrences between revisions
+*****Working/known broken perpherials (per revision)
+***Sample configuration(s)
+***Motherboard specific configuration items
+***Build tutorial
+And another one for chipsets as described above?
+Does that make more sense?
+--[[User:Jdarby|jdarby]] 23:06, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)
+*Motherboard Vendor
+**Motherboard
+***Chipset
+***Status
+***Diffrences between revisions
+***Build tutorial
+should be enough, actually the users only care about MB model and reversion.
+YH